McCormick v. Kmart Distribution Center

McCORMICK v. KMART DISTRIBUTION CENTER

This matter is before the Court upon the Motion for Summary Judgment on behalf of Defendants, Kmart Corporation (“Kmart”) and Sheldon Spiva (“Spiva”) (Dkt.# 36).

Summary from Leagle, Inc. In her Complaint, Plaintiff alleges that she was a victim of both hostile work environment and quid pro quo sexual harassment at the hands of Spiva1, in violation of O.R.C. § 4112 et seq. (Counts I and II, respectively). In addition, Plaintiff asserts a violation of Ohio public policy (Count III) and a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress (Count IV). Subject matter jurisdiction is premised upon 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (1996).

For more information:  www.leagle.com/decision/2001970163FSupp2d807_1904.xml/McCORMICK%20v.%20KMART%20DISTRIBUTION%20CENTER

  • Eliminating sex discrimination through research, education and legal activities
  • OHIO NOW ELF CONTACT INFORMATION

    7775 Brecksville Road
    Brecksville, OH 44141
    e-mail: ohionow@msn.com
  • WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW….

    Brochures available FREE by e-mailing ohionow@msn.com and listing the titles requested.

    What you should know... from the OH State Bar Association.

    TITLES
    1. Attorneys
    2. Bankruptcy
    3. Child Support
    4. Divorce, Dissolution and Separation
    5. Divorce Mediation
    6. Ohio's Marriage Laws
    7. Sharing Responsibilities after Separation
    8. Tenant/Landlord Rights and Obligations
    9. Your Rights if Questioned, Stopped or Arrested
  • CALENDAR

    January 2023
    M T W T F S S
     1
    2345678
    9101112131415
    16171819202122
    23242526272829
    3031