Eliminating sex discrimination through research, education and legal activities
McCORMICK v. KMART DISTRIBUTION CENTER
This matter is before the Court upon the Motion for Summary Judgment on behalf of Defendants, Kmart Corporation (“Kmart”) and Sheldon Spiva (“Spiva”) (Dkt.# 36).
Summary from Leagle, Inc. In her Complaint, Plaintiff alleges that she was a victim of both hostile work environment and quid pro quo sexual harassment at the hands of Spiva1, in violation of O.R.C. § 4112 et seq. (Counts I and II, respectively). In addition, Plaintiff asserts a violation of Ohio public policy (Count III) and a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress (Count IV). Subject matter jurisdiction is premised upon 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (1996).